|
MAINSTREAM MESSENGER
Vol. 2, No. 3 July 1999
20 Years of Fundamentalist Rule
Over the SBC
by Bruce Prescott
Twenty years ago two bold plans were vying for the hearts
and minds of Southern Baptists. Presnall Wood, editor of the Texas Baptist Standard,
called it "bold missions" vs. "bold politics."
Mainstream Baptists kicked off "Bold Mission Thrust," a plan to share
the gospel with every person on the globe by the year 2000.
Fundamentalists began a takeover of the SBC. More interested in
"theological purity" than in extending networks of missionaries, they organized
caravans of church buses. Buses filled with people devoted to electing Fundamentalist
presidents for the SBC.
On this 20th anniversary of the takeover we raise a single question: Who has benefited from the Fundamentalists takeover and who
has been harmed? Who has benefited from the Fundamentalists takeover and who
has been harmed?
Here are some answers from the perspective of Mainstream Baptists.
The Lost
Who knows how successful "Bold Mission Thrust" would have been had
Southern Baptists united to reach the world for Christ instead of being divided by
Fundamentalism. What can be said with certainty is that under Mainstream leadership
membership in Baptist churches grew for 53 consecutive years. Under Fundamentalist
leadership membership began to decline in less than 20 years.
Conclusion: More harm than benefit to the
Lost.
The Kingdom of God
In 1990 some Mainstream Baptists formed the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship to
devote themselves to "missions" instead of politics. Seeking to compliment
rather than compete with others, they focus on evangelizing "unreached people
groups" people living in isolated areas or under circumstances that make
sharing the gospel with them hazardous. They also contributed generously to support
the missions and ministries of the SBC until the Executive Board of the SBC refused to
accept any money from them.
Since 1996, when the SBC was restructured, the percentage of the budget going
for mission work has been reduced. Percentages for the Executive Committee and the Ethics
Commission have ballooned. In effect, money is being diverted from missions to
promote a right wing political agenda across America. Missionaries whose work had
previously been completely supported by the SBC are now being required to raise up to 50%
of the resources for their work among family and friends.
Conclusion: More harm than benefit for
SBC mission work; more benefit than harm for unreached peoples.
The Denomination
Since 1979 several Mainstream Baptist churches, including First Baptist Church
of Greenville*, S.C. have severed their ties with the SBC. During the same time,
several Independent Fundamental Baptist Churches, including First Baptist in Fort Worth,
TX (formerly pastored by J. Frank Norris) and Thomas Road Baptist in Lynchburg, VA
(pastored by Jerry Falwell) have united with the SBC.
Since 1979 several Baptist churches have removed denominational identification
from their name to avoid images of intolerance and dogmatism now associated with the word
"Baptist." The Baptist Sunday School Board has similarly changed its name
to LifeWay Christian Resources.
Conclusion: More harm than benefit to the
denomination.
The Local Church
In the past decade many SBC churches have been distributing voter guides
produced by the Christian Coalition and other right wing groups. Research has
demonstrated that the guides distort the truth, sometimes telling blatant lies, and are
skewed to favor certain candidates and political parties. The Christian Coalition
has been stripped of its tax-exempt status. Other organizations are under
investigation.
In the last decade several churches, including one pastored by a former SBC
president, have been investigated for involvements in secular political processes that
could jeopardize the churchs tax-exempt status.
Conclusion: More harm than benefit to the
local church.
The Individual Baptist
In 1988 Fundamentalists redefined the doctrine of the priesthood of the
believer to be the duty of every believer to submit to pastoral authority. Since
that time there has been a resurgence of church discipline in the SBC. Initially
discipline was being exercised by the pastor and a deacon in private. Now the chain
of command and discipline has been extended to denominational leaders who exercise
authority in the public media. As recent criticisms of the pastor of an American
President demonstrate, pastors are now expected to submit to the authority of
denominational leaders when the leaders want a church to publicly discipline and correct
an errant member. Pastors whom denominational leaders deem lax on church discipline
risk receiving public reprimands.
Conclusion: More harm than benefit to
individuals both lay and clergy.
*When this story was initially entered FBC of Columbia,SC was mistakenly
identified as leaving the SBC rather than FBC of Greenville. My deepest
apologies to both FBC of Columbia and FBC of Greenville for this error. -- BP
Here's
a link to further information about FBC Greenville's decision to leave the SBC.
Here's
a link about other churches leaving the SBC, including FBC of Columbia, MO.
|